Medical Ethics Alliance
Menu
  • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Home
    • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Home
  • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Events
    • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon News 
      • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Press Releases
        • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Publications
          • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon About 
            • Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Links
              • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Membership
                • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Contact
                  • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon My New Page
                    • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon My New Page
                      • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Charter to protect the rights of terminally ill children
                        • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Mediation for parents and families in difficult cases
                          • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Withdrawal of Food and Fluids- Supreme court Judgement
                            • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon supreme court ruling nutrition hydration nursing view
                              • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon Futile treatment- Futile lives?
                                • External link opens in new tab or window Link Icon Link Icon Link Icon My New Page

                                  Withdrawal of Food and Fluids- Supreme Court Judgement

                                  Issued by  the Medical  Ethics Alliance on 30th  July 2018

                                  In the light of today`s ruling by the Supreme Court that food and fluid , if delivered by tube, can be withdrawn from patients in the persistent vegetative or minimally conscious state without the agreement of a court, the Medical Ethics Alliance says;

                                   

                                  There is an ancient and respected tradition that food and fluid given by tube is rightly to be considered  basic care. Tube feeding is a routine procedure.

                                   Is it really in  the "best interests", of brain damaged patients to die of dehydration?

                                   In the light of the decision to withdraw the Liverpool Care Pathway, mainly because of the agonies of thirst, how can this judgement be reconciled with that?

                                   How confident can we be that thirst will not be experienced deep in the brain?

                                   There are very many other patients with severe brain damage or other degenerative cerebral conditions.  Could it not be deemed in their" best interests", to die?

                                   To what extent are these decisions driven by the of  cost of care and could not  inheritance be a consideration?

                                   

                                  Cautionary note,

                                   For self protection persons should make clear to their families that they forbid death by dehydration.

                                   

                                  Dr Anthony Cole

                                  secretary@medethicsalliance.org.uk



                                    Copyright 2019 Medical Ethics Alliance


                                    close lightbox